Close Menu X

How Can We Help?

GM makes another glaring error related to victim compensation fund

The allegations leveled against General Motors this year have come to characterize a record-setting year of automobile recalls. While many automakers have issued recalls for defects that could jeopardize safety, the GM scandal stands out as particularly egregious.

To recap, General Motors officials testified before Congress earlier this year about defective ignition switches that could turn off the engine (while the vehicle was in motion) if jostled even a little bit. This, in turn, could cut power to important safety features like air bags, power steering and power brakes. The most scandalous part of this fiasco was a revelation that certain GM officials have known about this defect for at least a decade but recalls were not issued until earlier this year.

In an attempt to finally address the problem and compensate victims, General Motors set up a compensation fund and put Kenneth R. Feinberg in charge of it. His previous work includes running compensation funds for victims of the World Trade Center attacks and the Boston Marathon bombing.

The deadline to submit claims had been December 31st, but it was recently extended by one month. Of the car accident claims submitted and reviewed so far, 33 death claims and 39 injury claims have been deemed eligible for compensation. This is a far cry from the 13 deaths originally identified by General Motors.

Since launching the fund, GM has tried to put a positive spin on its own actions by claiming that “our goal with the program has been to reach every eligible person impacted.” If that sentiment is genuine, the company seems to be doing a poor job. It was only earlier this month that the family of the earliest victim identified by GM was contacted. And the family was not contacted by GM.

It was officials from the New York Times who reached out to the family of an 81-year-old woman killed in a 2003 car accident. Because her name was redacted from the public version of GM’s internal report and no one apparently thought to reach out to the family, the victim’s family only recently learned that the compensation program exists and that they are eligible to receive at least $1 million in compensation.

Mr. Feinberg was likely far too diplomatic when he said that GM’s failure to notify the family was “unfortunate.” In light of this blunder, we have to wonder how many other mistakes have been made related to the defect and the decade-long cover-up by General Motors.

Source: The New York Times, “Deadline Extended for G.M. Accident Claims,” Danielle Ivory and Rachel Abrams, Nov. 16, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Our Awards and Accolades

    • The Best Lawyers in America
    • The National Trail Lawyers | Top 100 | Trail Lawyers
    • Newsweek Leaders In Showcase Personal Injury | 2011
    • Lawyers of Distinction | 2018
    • 2014 | Litigator Awards | Ranked Top 1% of Lawyers
    • Nation's Premier | NAOPIA | Top Ten Attorney | Personal Injury
    • American Law Society | Official Home of America's Top Lawyers
    • Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S.News & News Report | Rankings
    • New York Law Journal | 2015 Verdicts & Settlements | Hall of Fame | Motor Vehicle | Sakkas, Cahn & Weiss, LLP | Top 20 Verdict
    • Million Dollar Advocates Forum
    • Verdict Search's | Top NY Verdicts
    • Certified
    • National Association of Distinguished Counsel | Nation's Top One Percent | NADC
    • 2016 | Litigation Elite - Top 100 Trail Lawyers
    • Martindale-Hubbell | Distinguished | Peer Rated for High Professional Achievement | 2017
    • Who's who Legal | WWL
    • The National Advocates | Top 100 Lawyers
    • America's Top 100 Attorneys | Top 100
    • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trail Lawyers
    • Super Lawyers
    • Best Law Firms of America | LifeTime Member
    • Avvo | 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Personal Injury
Email Our Attorneys

Have Questions? Get A Free Case Review

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy