Close Menu X

How Can We Help?

Bill to put tenant relocation costs on landlords is back

New York City has a lot of buildings and a lot of them are not as safe as they should be. Considering that so many of them are called home by city residents, it is understandable that government leaders would be interested in trying to make sure the residences are as safe as possible.

Holding negligent landlords accountable for failing to provide safe accommodations is a struggle that has been going on for as long there have been even the most minimal of building codes. In the case of New York City, that means going back a few centuries. In the years since, the code has only gotten more comprehensive. And still, there are those who flagrantly disregard the law.

The result of such laxity is that buildings fall into significant disrepair to a point where they become downright dangerous. In the worst such cases, it becomes necessary to relocate the tenants for the sake of preservation of life and limb. And it becomes fair to ask, who should be responsible for the cost of those relocations?

Many argue that it should be the landlords who failed in their duty to maintain their properties in the first place. And under current Housing Preservation and Development Department policy there is a means for doing that. But it involves the HPD covering the costs up front and then having to go after the landlord later.

Sometimes the cost and the recovery probably don't wash, and new rules proposed by HPD would also restrict alternative housing options for tenants who do suffer displacement.

Fourteen members of the City Council say that's not right. They're getting behind a proposed bill that would let the HPD require landlords to put a certain amount of money into escrow for necessary repairs. Supporters say that in addition to making repair capital more readily available, the hope is that the requirement will deter landlords who willfully make their buildings hazardous as a ploy to vacate rent-regulated tenants.

It's not clear if the measure stands a chance of even getting a hearing at this point. The Real Estate Board of New York, which represents landlords, says the bill would be a punishment on all landlords for the deeds of a few bad actors.

What do you think?

Source: Capital New York, "Renewed push for unsafe-buildings bill decried by REBNY," Ryan Hutchins, Jan. 29, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Our Awards and Accolades

    • The Best Lawyers in America
    • The National Trail Lawyers | Top 100 | Trail Lawyers
    • Newsweek Leaders In Showcase Personal Injury | 2011
    • Lawyers of Distinction | 2018
    • 2014 | Litigator Awards | Ranked Top 1% of Lawyers
    • Nation's Premier | NAOPIA | Top Ten Attorney | Personal Injury
    • American Law Society | Official Home of America's Top Lawyers
    • Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S.News & News Report | Rankings
    • New York Law Journal | 2015 Verdicts & Settlements | Hall of Fame | Motor Vehicle | Sakkas, Cahn & Weiss, LLP | Top 20 Verdict
    • Million Dollar Advocates Forum
    • Verdict Search's | Top NY Verdicts
    • Certified
    • National Association of Distinguished Counsel | Nation's Top One Percent | NADC
    • 2016 | Litigation Elite - Top 100 Trail Lawyers
    • Martindale-Hubbell | Distinguished | Peer Rated for High Professional Achievement | 2017
    • Who's who Legal | WWL
    • The National Advocates | Top 100 Lawyers
    • America's Top 100 Attorneys | Top 100
    • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trail Lawyers
    • Best Lawyers | 2021
    • Super Lawyers
    • Best Law Firms of America | LifeTime Member
    • Avvo | 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Personal Injury
Email Our Attorneys

Have Questions? Get A Free Case Review

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy