Close Menu X

How Can We Help?

The Truth about the McDonald's Coffee Burn Case

By Adam Cahn, Esq.

It has been 22 years since Stella Liebeck accidentally poured boiling hot McDonald's coffee on her lap and got burned, and still not a month goes by without one of my clients telling me an offer to settle their case is too low and cites the amount of money the woman at McDonald's received.

The facts of that case never seem to matter—the story has become urban legend and, each year, the amount of money people remember Ms. Liebeck receiving for her injuries grows. At last count, people think she got more than $10 million.

Here are the actual facts of the case: Ms. Liebeck was 79 years of age at the time of the accident. She bought a cup of coffee at a drive-thru McDonald's in New Mexico and placed the cup between her thighs. It spilled and she suffered second- and third-degree burns to her thighs, buttocks and crotch — 6% of her body.

Ms. Liebeck initially requested that McDonald's pay her $20,000 to settle the matter. McDonald's countered with $800. Prior to trial, her attorneys increased the demand to $300,000 and a mediator recommended a settlement of $225,000, to which McDonald's refused. McDonald's felt that Ms. Liebeck used bad judgment putting the cup between her legs and spilled it herself. The case went to trial and the jury came back with a verdict of $200,000 in damages for her injuries, which the trial judge thought was too high and reduced it to $160,000.

The jury also awarded $2.7 million in punitive damages, an award designed not to reward the victim, but instead to punish the defendant for egregious conduct. The reason they felt McDonald's needed to be punished was that the restaurant's own witnesses admitted the following: the coffee was 185 degrees, which is dangerous and undrinkable; McDonald's kept the temperature that high because it stayed fresher longer; McDonald's was aware the coffee was dangerously hot, but stated that the number of reported burns in relation to the total number of cups sold was not high enough to justify the temperature modification; and, lastly, there were no warnings on the cup advising customers how badly burned one could get from this temperature. On appeal, the Court reduced the punitive damages to $480,000 — not quite the $10 million people remember.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Our Awards and Accolades

    • The Best Lawyers in America
    • The National Trail Lawyers | Top 100 | Trail Lawyers
    • Newsweek Leaders In Showcase Personal Injury | 2011
    • Lawyers of Distinction | 2018
    • 2014 | Litigator Awards | Ranked Top 1% of Lawyers
    • Nation's Premier | NAOPIA | Top Ten Attorney | Personal Injury
    • American Law Society | Official Home of America's Top Lawyers
    • Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S.News & News Report | Rankings
    • New York Law Journal | 2015 Verdicts & Settlements | Hall of Fame | Motor Vehicle | Sakkas, Cahn & Weiss, LLP | Top 20 Verdict
    • Million Dollar Advocates Forum
    • Verdict Search's | Top NY Verdicts
    • Certified
    • National Association of Distinguished Counsel | Nation's Top One Percent | NADC
    • 2016 | Litigation Elite - Top 100 Trail Lawyers
    • Martindale-Hubbell | Distinguished | Peer Rated for High Professional Achievement | 2017
    • Who's who Legal | WWL
    • The National Advocates | Top 100 Lawyers
    • America's Top 100 Attorneys | Top 100
    • The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trail Lawyers
    • Super Lawyers
    • Best Law Firms of America | LifeTime Member
    • Avvo | 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Personal Injury
Email Our Attorneys

Have Questions? Get A Free Case Review

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy